Chris Kirby Photoblog

San Diego, CA. Earlier this evening, first tilt photo.

Generations of photographers have been recognized not only for the breathtaking images they create, but also for their photographic style. Once a photographer nails down the basics of making a proper photograph (exposure, aperture, shutter speed, ISO, etc.) the next step is usually a personal exploration of different shooting styles and post processing techniques. Some photographers may only shoot in natural light, while others prefer to use strobes and flashes. Some use both. Then there are photographers that only shoot weddings and portraits, while others specialize in commercial work, and again; some do both. Needless to say, these are very general examples of what makes up a given photographic style. Other examples include choices in composition and aesthetic components, such as lens preferences and overall editing methods.

Over the years I’ve struggled, like many photographers, to find my voice in photographic style. Content wise, I know I prefer contemporary weddings and portraiture. But I’ve tried all sorts of editing methods. Crisp and clear, vintage, minimalist, color popping, oh the list goes on. None of these editing methods necessarily felt like me so to speak. Something always felt incomplete or missing. As of late however, the rich style of film emulation in digital photography has captivated my interest in a profound way. It can be very artistic and emotionally receptive and those are two attributes that really speak to me. When applied to wedding and portrait photography, it can create a look and feel of timeless beauty and professional sophistication that captures moments and emotions in a way that sleek, tack-sharp images do not. The fact that it’s emulating film causes it to have a look that won’t necessarily go out of style either, as film is more of a medium than an editing technique. When done well, the results of film emulation in digital photography can be absolutely stunning in my opinion.

Film emulation may not be for everyone. But there are plenty of people, photographers and photo enthusiasts alike, that love the look of it. As far as applying it to my photography, there’s a target audience for everything and I’ve learned that finding your niche and staying true to your perspective goes a long way in business. I feel that with this new direction, I’ve finally found my perspective, specifically my style. It’s subtle and natural, yet distinct. What I’ve learned thus far in film emulation is doing a great job of fulfilling that. I just haven’t found my niche yet; specifically my new target audience. But I’m very determined to, because I’m really looking forward to booking more clients in the upcoming new year.

Check out some of my favorite blogs to see great examples of film emulation in digital photography:

The Flan man. Sean’s work never ceases to impress me.
Cool guy, talked via email back in the day.
http://seanflanigan.net/blog/

Hugh Forte. Breathtaking simplicity.
http://hughforte.com/blog/

Sergio Mottola. I love his style of shooting high school seniors.
http://sergiomottola.com/blog/

Severin Koller. Shoots film, as well as digital.
Been following this talented Austrian since ’04 or so, back when he was Coxi on dA.
http://severinkoller.at/blog/

Jose Villa. Actually all film. But a fine example of the beauty film is capable of.
http://josevillablog.com/

Well off to do some photography myself. Hope everyone is having a splendid Friday.

Edit to add: A few have asked why I don’t shoot actual film?
I’ve shot and developed my own film in the past and enjoyed the experience. However, I’m more comfortable in an all digital workflow. From the cameras, to the software, to printing. I’ve also invested in digital since I began shooting and already have most of what I need. I love film cameras, but digital currently fits into my lifestyle better.